Today's hottest deals

Asrock X99 Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics67.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive178% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock X99 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory27.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160603
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 11 '16 at 14:01
Run Duration270 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5960X-$184
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
88.4% Excellent
Memory 90.1
1-Core 116
2-Core 240
83% 148 Pts
4-Core 466
8-Core 855
79% 660 Pts
64-Core 1,260
78% 1,260 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 88.4%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 Fury-X-$781
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 16.300.2311.0
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
67.9% Good
Lighting 87
Reflection 58.5
Parallax 119
71% 88.1 fps
MRender 59
Gravity 91.2
Splatting 75.8
62% 75.3 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 67.9%
Great: 65%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Marvell Raid VD 512GB
331GB free
Firmware: MV.R00-0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
122% Outstanding
Read 749
Write 781
Mixed 772
172% 767 MB/s
4K Read 31.6
4K Write 71.2
4K Mixed 28
122% 43.6 MB/s
DQ Read 46.1
DQ Write 287
DQ Mixed 108
101% 147 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 122%
Great: 122%
Intel 750 Series NVMe PCIe 400GB-$550
285GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0174 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
178% Outstanding
Read 1,380
Write 926
Mixed 1,139
255% 1,148 MB/s
4K Read 40.5
4K Write 141
4K Mixed 30.2
174% 70.4 MB/s
DQ Read 396
DQ Write 274
DQ Mixed 28.8
104% 233 MB/s
Poor: 123%
This bench: 178%
Great: 230%
PM RAID5 12TB
4TB free
Firmware: 0959 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
95.2% Outstanding
Read 182
Write 151
Mixed 135
117% 156 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0.73
4K Mixed 0.2
90% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 84%
This bench: 95.2%
Great: 121%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$61
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC54 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
74% Very good
Read 129
Write 129
Mixed 124
96% 127 MB/s
4K Read 0.74
4K Write 1.53
4K Mixed 0.19
81% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 74%
Great: 96%
Seagate ST33000651AS 3TB-$111
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC45 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
66.9% Good
Read 114
Write 119
Mixed 114
87% 116 MB/s
4K Read 0.89
4K Write 1.96
4K Mixed 0.63
143% 1.16 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 66.9%
Great: 86%
Seagate ST1000LM002-9VQ14L 1TB
344GB free
Firmware: CC94 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
25.6% Poor
Read 42.9
Write 46.5
Mixed 43.3
33% 44.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.37
4K Write 0.52
4K Mixed 0.1
36% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 25.6%
Great: 48%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$89
319GB free
Firmware: CC32 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
41.7% Average
Read 73.2
Write 72.1
Mixed 66.9
53% 70.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.71
4K Write 0.84
4K Mixed 0.59
111% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 41.7%
Great: 75%
Hitachi HUA723020ALA641 2TB-$78
143GB free
Firmware: MK7OA840 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
49.7% Average
Read 94
Write 79
Mixed 76.1
62% 83.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.77
4K Write 1.84
4K Mixed 0.43
114% 1.01 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 82%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT4G4DFS8213.C8FAR Micron 8ATF51264AZ-2G1A1 Micron 8ATF51264AZ-2G1A1 CT4G4DFS8213.C8FAR CT4G4DFS8213.C8FAR Micron 8ATF51264AZ-2G1A1 CT4G4DFS8213.C8FAR Micron 8ATF51264AZ-2G1A1 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
117% Outstanding
MC Read 49.5
MC Write 46.3
MC Mixed 42
131% 45.9 GB/s
SC Read 16.2
SC Write 22
SC Mixed 21.6
57% 19.9 GB/s
Latency 67.1
60% 67.1 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 844 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock X99 Extreme4 - $261

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Outstanding Total price: $768
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback