Today's hottest deals

Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics21.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive49.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus M5A99FX PRO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory8.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140407
Uptime12 Days
Run DateAug 06 '18 at 17:24
Run Duration175 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU 32%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-4100-$110
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
52.9% Above average
Memory 75.9
1-Core 62.4
2-Core 109
52% 82.3 Pts
4-Core 177
8-Core 170
23% 174 Pts
64-Core 163
10% 163 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 6950-$290
AMD(1002 0B00) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
21.1% Poor
Lighting 27.4
Reflection 21.3
Parallax 22.8
22% 23.8 fps
MRender 20
Gravity 21.4
Splatting 26
19% 22.5 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 21.1%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial M4 128GB-$116
18GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0309
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 154 138 47 73 110 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
49.6% Average
Read 415
Write 170
Mixed 210
SusWrite 108
50% 226 MB/s
4K Read 19.2
4K Write 40.4
4K Mixed 15
70% 24.9 MB/s
DQ Read 134
DQ Write 115
DQ Mixed 56.3
61% 102 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 72%
Marvell Raid VD 512GB
104GB free
Firmware: MV.R
SusWrite @10s intervals: 373 268 164 148 139 148 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
60.9% Good
Read 407
Write 469
Mixed 352
SusWrite 207
81% 359 MB/s
4K Read 17.2
4K Write 35.3
4K Mixed 24
76% 25.5 MB/s
DQ Read 174
DQ Write 197
DQ Mixed 163
129% 178 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 122%
WD Purple 3TB (2014)-$80
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 112 113 113 112 113 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
65.9% Good
Read 118
Write 112
Mixed 70.2
SusWrite 112
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
187% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 65.9%
Great: 85%
WD Purple 3TB (2014)-$80
2.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 134 139 137 137 137 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
78.6% Very good
Read 138
Write 117
Mixed 69.2
SusWrite 136
84% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
182% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 78.6%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR3 1600 DDR3 1600G DDR3 1600 DDR3 1600G 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39.5% Below average
MC Read 15.9
MC Write 11.9
MC Mixed 14.3
40% 14 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 8.4
SC Mixed 12.2
27% 9.53 GB/s
Latency 88.6
45% 88.6 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 39.5%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99FX PRO R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,080 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $570
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback