Today's hottest deals

Asus X99-E WS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics66.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive166% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus X99-E WS  (all builds)
Memory57.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170309
Uptime1 Days
Run DateSep 21 '17 at 15:32
Run Duration299 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6950X-$449
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
85.3% Excellent
Memory 91
1-Core 109
2-Core 222
80% 141 Pts
4-Core 427
8-Core 880
77% 653 Pts
64-Core 1,439
89% 1,439 Pts
Poor: 77%
This bench: 85.3%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 Fury-X-$781
CLim: 1050 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.1.1
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
66.8% Good
Lighting 85.4
Reflection 58.8
Parallax 117
70% 87.2 fps
MRender 58.1
Gravity 90.6
Splatting 75.3
62% 74.7 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 65%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$160
360GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
97.1% Outstanding
Read 512
Write 409
Mixed 419
99% 447 MB/s
4K Read 39.9
4K Write 67.1
4K Mixed 34.4
140% 47.2 MB/s
DQ Read 234
DQ Write 177
DQ Mixed 43.7
77% 152 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 97.1%
Great: 134%
Nvme INTEL SSDPEDMW80 800GB
236GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 8EV101F0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
166% Outstanding
Read 1,914
Write 867
Mixed 1,198
292% 1,326 MB/s
4K Read 27.9
4K Write 68.4
4K Mixed 23.4
108% 39.9 MB/s
DQ Read 31.9
DQ Write 161
DQ Mixed 23.2
39% 72.2 MB/s
Poor: 126%
This bench: 166%
Great: 224%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$160
56GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
75.1% Very good
Read 375
Write 289
Mixed 306
72% 324 MB/s
4K Read 30.1
4K Write 49.3
4K Mixed 31.7
112% 37 MB/s
DQ Read 209
DQ Write 137
DQ Mixed 74.1
82% 140 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 75.1%
Great: 134%
Seagate Barracuda Desktop 5TB-$180
4TB free
Firmware: CC49 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
74.7% Very good
Read 137
Write 121
Mixed 100
89% 120 MB/s
4K Read 1.29
4K Write 7.07
4K Mixed 0.5
240% 2.96 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 90%
PM RAID5 12TB
3TB free
Firmware: 0959 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
83.9% Excellent
Read 159
Write 134
Mixed 117
102% 137 MB/s
4K Read 0.48
4K Write 0.57
4K Mixed 0.1
42% 0.38 MB/s
Poor: 84%
This bench: 83.9%
Great: 121%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$61
3TB free
Firmware: CC54 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
92.1% Outstanding
Read 159
Write 162
Mixed 140
115% 154 MB/s
4K Read 0.72
4K Write 1.62
4K Mixed 0.22
84% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 92.1%
Great: 96%
Seagate Barracuda Desktop 5TB-$180
2TB free
Firmware: CC49 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 34% Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda Desktop 5TB-$180
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC48 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 34% Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2666 C16 8x8GB
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
125% Outstanding
MC Read 53.7
MC Write 50.9
MC Mixed 44.1
142% 49.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 18.7
SC Mixed 20.8
51% 17.8 GB/s
Latency 65.7
61% 65.7 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 125%
Great: 137%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-E WS Builds (Compare 290 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 97%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 93%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus X99-E WS - $473

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 109% - Outstanding Total price: $894
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback