Today's hottest deals

Emachines EL1352G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.75% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive23.5% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemEmachines EL1352G  (all builds)
MotherboardeMachines EL1352G
Memory5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100923
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 08 '18 at 07:50
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X2 220
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
39.5% Below average
Memory 66.9
1-Core 39.1
2-Core 55.6
37% 53.9 Pts
4-Core 74.2
8-Core 71.2
10% 72.7 Pts
64-Core 75.5
5% 75.5 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 39.5%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
PNY(196E 118B) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 398.36
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
3.75% Terrible
Lighting 4.43
Reflection 4.35
Parallax 4.16
4% 4.31 fps
MRender 4.24
Gravity 3.87
Splatting 6.09
4% 4.73 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.75%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$30
80GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 93 47 124 65 56 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
23.5% Poor
Read 140
Write 32.4
Mixed 40.1
SusWrite 87.9
16% 75 MB/s
4K Read 13.2
4K Write 14.5
4K Mixed 9
39% 12.2 MB/s
DQ Read 13.9
DQ Write 20
DQ Mixed 13.6
11% 15.8 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 23.5%
Great: 85%
Toshiba MQ01ABF032 320GB-$37
298GB free
Firmware: AM0P
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 95 95 97 97 97 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
54.1% Above average
Read 92.7
Write 94.4
Mixed 30.8
SusWrite 95.7
57% 78.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.5
110% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 64C0MHHHJ-HS 8GB
1066, 1066 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
22.3% Poor
MC Read 8.5
MC Write 5.1
MC Mixed 8.9
21% 7.5 GB/s
SC Read 5.7
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 5.8
16% 5.5 GB/s
Latency 109
37% 109 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 22.3%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EL1352G Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Emachines EL1352G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $50
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback