Today's hottest deals

Biostar N68S3B

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive27.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardBiostar N68S3B  (all builds)
Memory2 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20101112
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateSep 16 '22 at 12:25
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X2 220
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
47.2% Average
Memory 83.5
1-Core 40.9
2-Core 80.7
46% 68.4 Pts
4-Core 65
8-Core 82.5
9% 73.8 Pts
64-Core 79.4
5% 79.4 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 7025 / nForce 630a
Biostar(1565 1405) 32MB
Ram: 32MB, Driver: 309.08
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 0% Great: 0%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Esa3smf2 HTGT120GB 120GB
71GB free (System drive)
Firmware: O102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 118 130 132 129 130 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
27.2% Poor
Read 164
Write 112
Mixed 113
SusWrite 123
29% 128 MB/s
4K Read 10.5
4K Write 27.9
4K Mixed 4.7
37% 14.4 MB/s
DQ Read 17.6
DQ Write 103
DQ Mixed 7.1
21% 42.4 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 27.2%
Great: 56%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$33
461GB free
Firmware: JC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 103 132 132 106 133 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
44.2% Average
Read 31.5
Write 85.9
Mixed 39.5
SusWrite 122
51% 69.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
159% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1333 CL9 RMR1810KC58E8F1333 4GB
533, 533 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
22.2% Poor
MC Read 9
MC Write 4.7
MC Mixed 7.5
20% 7.07 GB/s
SC Read 3.7
SC Write 4.3
SC Mixed 6.2
14% 4.73 GB/s
Latency 74.3
54% 74.3 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N68S3B Builds (Compare 53 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 19%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar N68S3B

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $233Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback