Today's hottest deals

HP Z220 CMT Workstation

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics22% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Z220 CMT Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1790
Memory2.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170706
Uptime1.7 Days
Run DateJul 02 '18 at 15:46
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User PAK-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
79.4% Very good
Memory 89.5
1-Core 106
2-Core 210
78% 135 Pts
4-Core 401
8-Core 400
54% 401 Pts
64-Core 402
25% 402 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 79.4%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 460-$90
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 24.20.11016.4
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
22% Poor
Lighting 25.4
Reflection 31.2
Parallax 29.8
21% 28.8 fps
MRender 30.6
Gravity 23.4
Splatting 33.9
24% 29.3 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 22%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$42
28GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC37
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 68 54 72 77 78 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
41.1% Average
Read 76.7
Write 72.7
Mixed 55.9
SusWrite 66.2
50% 67.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
172% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 70%
WD WD20EARS-00MVWB0 1.5TB
1GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 95
Write 99.3
Mixed 29
54% 74.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.4
83% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 40% Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 9JSF25672AZ-1G6M1 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
32.7% Below average
MC Read 10.8
MC Write 10.8
MC Mixed 9
29% 10.2 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 11.6
SC Mixed 10.7
32% 11.1 GB/s
Latency 67.8
59% 67.8 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 32.7%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z220 CMT Workstation Builds (Compare 1,349 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

System: HP Z220 CMT Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $381
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback