Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 2552A13

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics18% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive50.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemLenovo 2552A13  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO MAHOBAY
Memory1.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120719
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 20 '20 at 16:44
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User EGY-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1225 V2-$200
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
75.9% Very good
Memory 88.8
1-Core 95.6
2-Core 179
72% 121 Pts
4-Core 364
8-Core 367
49% 366 Pts
64-Core 366
23% 366 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 75.9%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$90
Gigabyte(1458 362D) 2GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 442.19
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
18% Very poor
Lighting 22.6
Reflection 17.2
Parallax 20.3
18% 20 fps
MRender 25.5
Gravity 22.7
Splatting 16.9
17% 21.7 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 18%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$30
70GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 135 139 142 139 144 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
50.7% Above average
Read 397
Write 194
Mixed 199
SusWrite 146
52% 234 MB/s
4K Read 22.3
4K Write 33.7
4K Mixed 20.2
78% 25.4 MB/s
DQ Read 49.1
DQ Write 50.2
DQ Mixed 44.1
35% 47.8 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 85%
SanDisk U3 Cruzer Micro 2GB
2GB free, PID 5406
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.8 11 10 11 10 9.9 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
6.62% Terrible
Read 21.5
Write 2.3
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 10.2
10% 9.55 MB/s
4K Read 5.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
20% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.62%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 9JSF25672AZ-1G6M1 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
55.4% Above average
MC Read 20.3
MC Write 19.7
MC Mixed 17.8
55% 19.3 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 16.4
SC Mixed 16.1
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 68.7
58% 68.7 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 2552A13 Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 2552A13

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $279
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback