Today's hottest deals

Intel NUC8i7HVB

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive198% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemIntel NUC8i7HVK
MotherboardIntel NUC8i7HVB  (all builds)
Memory8.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180222
Uptime2.9 Days
Run DateJun 19 '18 at 09:44
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8809G
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
83.3% Excellent
Memory 88
1-Core 121
2-Core 239
84% 150 Pts
4-Core 423
8-Core 681
68% 552 Pts
64-Core 685
42% 685 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 83.3%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH
Intel(8086 2073) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1190 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: Q1 2018
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 36% Great: 38%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 3D SATA M.2 500GB-$97
348GB free
Firmware: X61130WD Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
75.7% Very good
Read 488
Write 334
Mixed 336
86% 386 MB/s
4K Read 31.9
4K Write 57.9
4K Mixed 12.9
96% 34.2 MB/s
DQ Read 186
DQ Write 196
DQ Mixed 50.3
77% 144 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 75.7%
Great: 116%
Samsung SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 128GB
59GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXZ7300Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
198% Outstanding
Read 2,482
Write 702
Mixed 1,073
309% 1,419 MB/s
4K Read 49.1
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 31.5
178% 66.4 MB/s
DQ Read 51.8
DQ Write 129
DQ Mixed 31.7
41% 71 MB/s
Poor: 133%
This bench: 198%
Great: 273%
Microsoft Virtual Disk 11GB
2GB free
Firmware: 1.0
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
86% Excellent
Read 464
Write 472
Mixed 470
105% 469 MB/s
4K Read 28.3
4K Write 56.1
4K Mixed 15.6
92% 33.3 MB/s
DQ Read 249
DQ Write 278
DQ Mixed 67.9
105% 198 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 86%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G4S26BFSDK.8FBD 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
73.9% Very good
MC Read 28.8
MC Write 28.5
MC Mixed 21.6
75% 26.3 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 26.9
SC Mixed 22.7
62% 21.8 GB/s
Latency 69.6
58% 69.6 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical NUC8i7HVB Builds (Compare 744 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Intel NUC8i7HVB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $170
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback