Today's hottest deals

Monster TULPAR T7 V16.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics54% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive179% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMonster TULPAR T7 V16.1  (all builds)
MotherboardMONSTER TULPAR T7 V16.1
Memory14.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180628
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 18 '18 at 21:50
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
93.6% Outstanding
Memory 94.2
1-Core 130
2-Core 260
90% 161 Pts
4-Core 500
8-Core 813
80% 657 Pts
64-Core 998
62% 998 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 93.6%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile)
Clevo(1558 8500) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 389.27
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
54% Above average
Lighting 65.5
Reflection 73.7
Parallax 58.2
53% 65.8 fps
MRender 70.3
Gravity 61.5
Splatting 70.2
55% 67.4 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 54%
Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB256HAHQ-00000 256GB
192GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXD7101Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 996 310 309 311 309 309 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
179% Outstanding
Read 1002
Write 710
Mixed 644
SusWrite 424
155% 695 MB/s
4K Read 54
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 68.6
231% 79.6 MB/s
DQ Read 947
DQ Write 928
DQ Mixed 954
712% 943 MB/s
Poor: 119%
This bench: 179%
Great: 249%
Seagate ST1000LM049-2GH172 1TB
928GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 172 169 169 170 170 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
94.5% Outstanding
Read 159
Write 174
Mixed 69.7
SusWrite 170
104% 143 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
215% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 94.5%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G4S26BFSDK.8FBD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
83.5% Excellent
MC Read 32.4
MC Write 31.2
MC Mixed 24
83% 29.2 GB/s
SC Read 19.3
SC Write 33.7
SC Mixed 26.5
76% 26.5 GB/s
Latency 59.2
68% 59.2 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 83.5%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TULPAR T7 V16.1 Builds (Compare 40 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Monster TULPAR T7 V16.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 31% - Below average Total price: $40
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback