| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 1.04% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (63%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | HP Compaq 8200 Elite SFF PC (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 1495 |
| Memory | 4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colori |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20120620 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Jun 13 '18 at 15:29 |
| Run Duration | 212 Seconds |
| Run User | ITA-User |
| Background CPU | 63% |
PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
58.8%
Above average
|
56% 87.2 Pts
|
28% 216 Pts
|
14% 219 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)
HP(103C 1495) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
|
1.04%
Terrible
|
1% 1.16 fps
|
1% 1.55 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Hitachi HDS721025CLA382 250GB-$261
73GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JP1OA3GH Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
|
69.7%
Good
|
90% 120 MB/s
|
85% 0.78 MB/s
| |
|
Kingston DataTraveler 3.0 126GB
73GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
|
6.99%
Terrible
|
15% 15.3 MB/s
|
16% 1.3 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M378B5773CH0-CH9 Micron 16JTF25664AZ-1G4G1 M378B5773CH0-CH9 Micron 16JTF25664AZ-1G4G1 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
42.7%
Average
|
43% 14.9 GB/s
|
32% 11.1 GB/s
|
52% 77.5 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Compaq 8200 Elite SFF PC Builds (Compare 3,304 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: HP Compaq 8200 Elite SFF PC
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-2400Intel $79Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 1,690x |
| Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples | 563x |
| Core i7-2600Intel $136Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 553x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 1,776x |
| GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples | 285x |
| GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples | 245x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 71% - Very good | Total price: $104 |