Today's hottest deals

Packard imedia S3810

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.96% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemPackard imedia S3810  (all builds)
MotherboardPackard imedia S3810
Memory3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100819
Uptime23.3 Days
Run DateMar 09 '20 at 17:06
Run Duration108 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 650-$70
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
52.8% Above average
Memory 70.4
1-Core 85.4
2-Core 147
60% 101 Pts
4-Core 205
8-Core 205
28% 205 Pts
64-Core 203
13% 203 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 420
Sapphire(174B 1162) 1GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
1.96% Terrible
Lighting 2.33
Reflection 2.65
Parallax 1.94
2% 2.31 fps
MRender 3.14
Gravity 2.17
Splatting 2.39
2% 2.57 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.96%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
644GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 57 70 36 67 83 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
43% Average
Read 91.7
Write 92.7
Mixed 55.5
SusWrite 58.2
55% 74.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
103% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 43%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5773CH0-CH9 Micron 16JTF25664AZ-1G4G1 M378B5773CH0-CH9 Micron 16JTF25664AZ-1G4G1 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
31% Below average
MC Read 10.2
MC Write 9
MC Mixed 13.3
31% 10.8 GB/s
SC Read 8.2
SC Write 7
SC Mixed 7.3
21% 7.5 GB/s
Latency 100
40% 100 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 31%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical imedia S3810 Builds (Compare 103 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Packard imedia S3810

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $110
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback