Today's hottest deals

HP Pavilion dm4 Notebook PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics0.85% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemHP Pavilion dm4 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 146A
Memory1.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20111221
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateApr 28 '18 at 16:36
Run Duration313 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 M 450
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 48.7
2-Core 89.3
32% 69 Pts
4-Core 61.3
8-Core 38.3
7% 49.8 Pts
64-Core 18.8
1% 18.8 Pts
Poor: 27% Great: 46%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)
HP(103C 146A) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2202
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
0.85% Terrible
Lighting 0.97
Reflection 1.23
Parallax 0.94
1% 1.04 fps
MRender 0.9
Gravity 0.7
Splatting 1.74
1% 1.11 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.85%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black 2.5" 320GB (2010)-$42
205GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
55.4% Above average
Read 106
Write 87.1
Mixed 92.1
72% 95.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.55
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.35
86% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 60%
Seagate Expansion 1TB
41GB free, PID 2321
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
12.8% Very poor
Read 19.4
Write 17.3
Mixed 18.6
24% 18.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.36
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.25
78% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.8%
Great: 43%
SanDisk Ultra 32GB
25GB free, PID 5590
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
10.8% Very poor
Read 20.5
Write 11.4
Mixed 16.3
19% 16.1 MB/s
4K Read 2.11
4K Write 1.56
4K Mixed 0.96
94% 1.54 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 10.8%
Great: 36%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5773CHS-CH9 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 1067 MHz
Relative performance (0th percentile)
3.73% Terrible
MC Read 1.5
MC Write 1.3
MC Mixed 1.6
4% 1.47 GB/s
SC Read 0.2
SC Write 0.6
SC Mixed 0.4
1% 0.4 GB/s
Latency 1,247
3% 1,247 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 3.73%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion dm4 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 292 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion dm4 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $260
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback