Today's hottest deals

Samsung RV411/RV511/E3511/S3511/RV711/E3411

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (5th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 95 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (46%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 94% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemSamsung RV411/RV511/E3511/S3511/RV711/E3411  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG RV411/RV511/E3511/S3511/RV711/E3411
Memory1.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110615
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 04 '22 at 12:19
Run Duration307 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 46%
CPU Throttled 94%

 PC Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3 M 370-$167
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
28.9% Poor
Memory 48.1
1-Core 37.4
2-Core 48.5
30% 44.7 Pts
4-Core 59
8-Core 56.1
8% 57.5 Pts
64-Core 59.2
4% 59.2 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 28.9%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 315M
Sanyo(144D C581) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 341.74
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 1% Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung HN-M500MBB 500GB-$80
308GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2AR10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 14 30 27 33 25 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
10.2% Very poor
Read 11
Write 17.2
Mixed 12
SusWrite 24.5
12% 16.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.1
23% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 10.2%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5773CHS-CH9 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 1334 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
14.7% Very poor
MC Read 5.1
MC Write 4.9
MC Mixed 5.3
15% 5.1 GB/s
SC Read 2.6
SC Write 2.6
SC Mixed 3.5
8% 2.9 GB/s
Latency 168
24% 168 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 14.7%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical RV411/RV511/E3511/S3511/RV711/E3411 Builds (Compare 167 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 20%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung RV411/RV511/E3511/S3511/RV711/E3411

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 45% - Average Total price: $155
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback