Today's hottest deals

Gateway FX6840

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.38% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGateway FX6840  (all builds)
MotherboardGateway FX6840
Memory0.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100401
Uptime1 Days
Run DateMar 20 '18 at 09:29
Run Duration426 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 36%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-750-$60
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
62% Good
Memory 91.7
1-Core 64.7
2-Core 137
61% 97.7 Pts
4-Core 184
8-Core 222
26% 203 Pts
64-Core 263
16% 263 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 62%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 330
Sapphire(174B 3058) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 342.1
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
4.38% Terrible
Lighting 5.73
Reflection 5.85
Parallax 2
5% 4.53 fps
MRender 5.43
Gravity 4.53
Splatting 4.26
4% 4.74 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.38%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$63
740GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
74.7% Very good
Read 131
Write 129
Mixed 115
94% 125 MB/s
4K Read 0.89
4K Write 1.77
4K Mixed 0.27
100% 0.98 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 108%
TOSHIBA TransMemory 8GB
1GB free, PID 6544
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
5.05% Terrible
Read 18.8
Write 7.58
Mixed 6.34
12% 10.9 MB/s
4K Read 2.8
4K Write 0.004
4K Mixed 0.006
11% 0.94 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.05%
Great: 8%
USB 2.0 Flash Disk 2GB
0GB free, PID 6025
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
4.89% Terrible
Read 14.7
Write 6.6
Mixed 8.64
11% 9.98 MB/s
4K Read 5.32
4K Write 0.02
4K Mixed 0.02
21% 1.79 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.89%
Great: 5%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M378B5673FH0-CH9 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
39.9% Below average
MC Read 15.7
MC Write 12
MC Mixed 14.3
40% 14 GB/s
SC Read 4.7
SC Write 9.1
SC Mixed 9.9
23% 7.9 GB/s
Latency 64.6
62% 64.6 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FX6840 Builds (Compare 110 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: Gateway FX6840

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $379
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback