Today's hottest deals

Acer Aspire M7811

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.08% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire M7811  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer H57M01
Memory1.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20091231
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateSep 27 '18 at 16:54
Run Duration174 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-750-$60
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
60.8% Good
Memory 84.5
1-Core 70.5
2-Core 132
59% 95.7 Pts
4-Core 207
8-Core 270
30% 238 Pts
64-Core 236
15% 236 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 60.8%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 330
MSI(1462 1862) 768MB
Ram: 768MB, Driver: 342.1
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
5.08% Terrible
Lighting 6.87
Reflection 6.58
Parallax 2.38
6% 5.27 fps
MRender 5.9
Gravity 5.37
Splatting 4.09
4% 5.12 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.08%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3250410AS 250GB-$95
193GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4.AAA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 42 45 60 61 63 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
36.4% Below average
Read 76
Write 66.5
Mixed 39.5
SusWrite 50.8
43% 58.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
127% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 36.4%
Great: 54%
WD Blue 160GB (2007)-$56
84GB free
Firmware: 01.03A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 44 48 60 62 62 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
29.1% Poor
Read 48.7
Write 49.7
Mixed 33.7
SusWrite 52.2
34% 46.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
118% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 29.1%
Great: 59%
WD Elements 25A2 1.5TB
1.5TB free, PID 25a2
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 25 27 27 27 27 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
16.3% Very poor
Read 32.2
Write 26.2
Mixed 25.5
SusWrite 25.8
36% 27.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
94% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 16.3%
Great: 65%
VendorCo ProductCode 32GB
29GB free, PID 5678
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.1 2.3 4.9 5.4 4.6 5.4 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 5.5
Write 5.2
SusWrite 3.9
6% 4.87 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Mixed 0
0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown EBJ21UE8BDF0-DJ-F Samsung M378B5673FH0-CH9 4GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
24.4% Poor
MC Read 7.5
MC Write 7.6
MC Mixed 6.9
21% 7.33 GB/s
SC Read 7.8
SC Write 7.8
SC Mixed 7.7
22% 7.77 GB/s
Latency 72.7
55% 72.7 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire M7811 Builds (Compare 65 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire M7811

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $360
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback