Today's hottest deals

MSI MS-17Q2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 111%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 119%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics9.06% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive519% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star Titan GT77HX 13VI
MotherboardMSI MS-17Q2  (all builds)
Memory119.6 GB free of 128 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20231019
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 02 '24 at 12:05
Run Duration271 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-13980HX
U3E1, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
119% Outstanding
Memory 74
1-Core 231
2-Core 441
127% 249 Pts
4-Core 870
8-Core 1617
148% 1,243 Pts
64-Core 3,087
191% 3,087 Pts
Poor: 111%
This bench: 119%
Great: 122%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
MSI(1462 13C4) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.5084
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
9.06% Terrible
Lighting 9.9
Reflection 16.1
Parallax 11.4
8% 12.5 fps
MRender 14.5
Gravity 15.1
Splatting 11.5
11% 13.7 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 9.06%
Great: 10%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial T700 M.2 2TB-$260
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: PACR5102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2958 3065 3063 3174 3151 3126 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
519% Outstanding
Read 4017
Write 3,024
Mixed 2,421
SusWrite 3,090
703% 3,138 MB/s
4K Read 79.8
4K Write 208
4K Mixed 114
377% 134 MB/s
DQ Read 1,695
DQ Write 659
DQ Mixed 1,386
970% 1,247 MB/s
Poor: 475%
This bench: 519%
Great: 926%
Nvme Seagate ZP2000GM30004 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: SUESR010 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2238 2383 2380 2403 2401 2394 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
394% Outstanding
Read 2,981
Write 2448
Mixed 2008
SusWrite 2,366
550% 2,451 MB/s
4K Read 56.8
4K Write 121
4K Mixed 80.9
254% 86.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,720
DQ Write 578
DQ Mixed 1,257
900% 1185 MB/s
Poor: 394%
This bench: 394%
Great: 785%
Nvme WD_BLACK SN850X 4000GB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 624331WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2437 2466 2480 2489 2486 2428 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
442% Outstanding
Read 3,353
Write 2,570
Mixed 2,164
SusWrite 2,464
591% 2,638 MB/s
4K Read 73.9
4K Write 198
4K Mixed 92.5
335% 122 MB/s
DQ Read 1,847
DQ Write 581
DQ Mixed 1,262
918% 1,230 MB/s
Poor: 274%
This bench: 442%
Great: 691%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance SODIM CMSX64GX5M2A4800C40 4x31.8GB
4 of 4 slots used
127GB SODIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
115% Outstanding
MC Read 44.4
MC Write 43.2
MC Mixed 41.3
123% 43 GB/s
SC Read 20.2
SC Write 41.1
SC Mixed 31
88% 30.8 GB/s
Latency 90.2
44% 90.2 ns
Poor: 113%
This bench: 115%
Great: 138%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 72 60 144 17.2" 1280 720 AUO41A2
Typical MS-17Q2 Builds (Compare 175 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 236%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 290%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MS-17Q2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback