Today's hottest deals

MSI MS-17Q2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 277%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 121%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 337%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (93rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 7 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 121%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics237% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive569% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star Titan GT77HX 13VI
MotherboardMSI MS-17Q2  (all builds)
Memory120.1 GB free of 128 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20231019
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 25 '24 at 20:55
Run Duration270 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-13980HX
U3E1, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 4.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
121% Outstanding
Memory 77.2
1-Core 230
2-Core 460
130% 256 Pts
4-Core 875
8-Core 1,634
150% 1,254 Pts
64-Core 3,170
196% 3,170 Pts
Poor: 111%
This bench: 121%
Great: 122%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090 (Laptop)
MSI(1462 13C4) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4500 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 546.32
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
237% Outstanding
Lighting 338
Reflection 360
Parallax 368
275% 355 fps
MRender 473
Gravity 312
Splatting 223
262% 336 fps
Poor: 144%
This bench: 237%
Great: 243%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 990 Pro M.2 2TB-$160
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B2QJXD7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4635 4643 4559 4752 3855 1159 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
569% Outstanding
Read 1,975
Write 4824
Mixed 2,882
SusWrite 3,934
778% 3,404 MB/s
4K Read 94.9
4K Write 342
4K Mixed 155
523% 197 MB/s
DQ Read 2,225
DQ Write 1,709
DQ Mixed 1,926
1,452% 1,954 MB/s
Poor: 286%
This bench: 569%
Great: 587%
Samsung 990 Pro M.2 2TB-$160
2TB free
Firmware: 4B2QJXD7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3275 4797 4846 4851 4850 1517 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
632% Outstanding
Read 3,295
Write 4,913
Mixed 2,968
SusWrite 4,023
861% 3,800 MB/s
4K Read 93.9
4K Write 346
4K Mixed 155
524% 198 MB/s
DQ Read 2,313
DQ Write 1,809
DQ Mixed 2,012
1,519% 2,045 MB/s
Poor: 286%
This bench: 632%
Great: 587%
Samsung 990 Pro M.2 2TB-$160
2TB free
Firmware: 4B2QJXD7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3132 4457 4454 4452 4452 2731 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
592% Outstanding
Read 3,047
Write 4,470
Mixed 2,738
SusWrite 3,946
805% 3,550 MB/s
4K Read 72.4
4K Write 302
4K Mixed 135
442% 170 MB/s
DQ Read 2,315
DQ Write 1,809
DQ Mixed 1994
1,510% 2,039 MB/s
Poor: 286%
This bench: 592%
Great: 587%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance SODIM CMSX64GX5M2A4800C40 4x31.8GB
4 of 4 slots used
127GB SODIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 4000 MHz
Performing below potential (98th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
138% Outstanding
MC Read 54
MC Write 53
MC Mixed 50.5
150% 52.5 GB/s
SC Read 20.4
SC Write 49
SC Mixed 33
98% 34.1 GB/s
Latency 85.1
47% 85.1 ns
Poor: 113%
This bench: 138%
Great: 138%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 60 23.8" 1280 720 DELA0E7 Dell S2417DG
Typical MS-17Q2 Builds (Compare 175 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 236%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 290%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MS-17Q2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback