Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-H97-D3H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics26.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive88% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte H97-D3H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H97-D3H-CF  (all builds)
Memory13 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150919
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateSep 22 '23 at 05:44
Run Duration223 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU 35%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
75.1% Very good
Memory 84
1-Core 107
2-Core 209
76% 133 Pts
4-Core 357
8-Core 540
56% 448 Pts
64-Core 518
32% 518 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 75.1%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 85FF) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
26.6% Poor
Lighting 33.8
Reflection 36.4
Parallax 34.6
28% 34.9 fps
MRender 34.3
Gravity 34.6
Splatting 24.3
25% 31.1 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 26.6%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN750 SE NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$49
90GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 711250WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 270 188 209 177 172 335 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
88% Excellent
Read 489
Write 176
Mixed 368
SusWrite 225
70% 315 MB/s
4K Read 22.1
4K Write 66.1
4K Mixed 44
125% 44.1 MB/s
DQ Read 404
DQ Write 259
DQ Mixed 284
225% 316 MB/s
Poor: 114%
This bench: 88%
Great: 247%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$100
162GB free
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 253 265 271 273 274 271 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
90.6% Outstanding
Read 424
Write 401
Mixed 317
SusWrite 268
79% 352 MB/s
4K Read 33.3
4K Write 63.7
4K Mixed 41.1
137% 46 MB/s
DQ Read 355
DQ Write 305
DQ Mixed 221
195% 294 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 90.6%
Great: 118%
WDC WD20EZAZ-00GGJB0 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 157 161 159 161 161 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
19.9% Very poor
Read 177
Write 122
Mixed 103
SusWrite 159
31% 140 MB/s
4K Read 3.1
4K Write 8.5
4K Mixed 0.8
10% 4.13 MB/s
DQ Read 0.9
DQ Write 11
DQ Mixed 1.3
2% 4.4 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 19.9%
Great: 23%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016)-$82
47GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 90 90 91 90 91 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
51.1% Above average
Read 87.5
Write 61.8
Mixed 56.9
SusWrite 90.4
55% 74.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 114%
WDC WD15 EACS-11BHUB0 1.5TB
155GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 66 67 69 68 68 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
30.9% Below average
Read 73.8
Write 61.1
Mixed 50.1
SusWrite 66.8
84% 63 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
83% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 30.9%
Great: 34%
WDC WD20 PURZ-85GU6Y0 2TB
37GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 65 68 62 67 67 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
35.5% Below average
Read 97.7
Write 96.9
Mixed 45.9
SusWrite 64.7
100% 76.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
111% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 35.5%
Great: 39%
ST2000DM 001-1ER164 2TB
7GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.6 3 3 8.4 1 3.4 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
20.2% Poor
Read 98
Write 62.9
Mixed 63.4
SusWrite 4.4
69% 57.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
80% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 20.2%
Great: 60%
WDC WD40 EZRZ-00GXCB0 4TB
539GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.8 1.9 1.3 0.9 0.4 0.3 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
22.6% Poor
Read 101
Write 106
Mixed 59.8
SusWrite 1.8
84% 67 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
119% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 22.6%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C10D3/4G 0420 F3-1600C9-8GXM KHX1600C10D3/4G 0420 F3-1600C9-8GXM 24GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
46.8% Average
MC Read 16.1
MC Write 16.8
MC Mixed 14.8
45% 15.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 16.7
SC Mixed 14.9
42% 14.6 GB/s
Latency 74.7
54% 74.7 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 30 84.6" 1280 720 SAM0DF6 SAMSUNG
Typical GA-H97-D3H-CF Builds (Compare 1,382 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H97-D3H-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $415
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $230Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback