Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-H97-D3H-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive102% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte H97-D3H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H97-D3H-CF  (all builds)
Memory3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150919
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 07 '21 at 13:07
Run Duration200 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU 35%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
82.7% Excellent
Memory 92.8
1-Core 115
2-Core 190
79% 133 Pts
4-Core 408
8-Core 485
58% 447 Pts
64-Core 582
36% 582 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 82.7%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 85FF) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2176 MHz, MLim: 1934 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.40
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 37.8
Reflection 2.8
46% 20.3 fps
Poor: 27% Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$100
116GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 280 139 211 268 144 105 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 441
Write 416
Mixed 342
SusWrite 191
78% 347 MB/s
4K Read 40.9
4K Write 99.5
4K Mixed 54
184% 64.8 MB/s
DQ Read 370
DQ Write 333
DQ Mixed 232
207% 312 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 102%
Great: 118%
WDC WD20EZAZ-00GGJB0 2TB
938GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 143 147 146 148 146 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
18.4% Very poor
Read 164
Write 154
Mixed 102
SusWrite 145
32% 141 MB/s
4K Read 3.1
4K Write 8.1
4K Mixed 0.8
10% 4 MB/s
DQ Read 0.9
DQ Write 10.1
DQ Mixed 1.1
2% 4.03 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 18.4%
Great: 23%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$47
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 180 184 183 183 183 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 182
Write 148
Mixed 81.3
SusWrite 180
108% 148 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 104%
Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016)-$82
56GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 89 92 93 92 92 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
50.7% Above average
Read 84.7
Write 58.5
Mixed 62
SusWrite 91.8
55% 74.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 114%
WDC WD15 EACS-11BHUB0 1.5TB
710GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 46 45 44 46 46 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
30.3% Below average
Read 93.1
Write 93.4
Mixed 55.4
SusWrite 45.4
94% 71.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
100% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 30.3%
Great: 34%
WDC WD20 PURZ-85GU6Y0 2TB
49GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 46 45 44 46 47 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
34.1% Below average
Read 112
Write 99.7
Mixed 48.9
SusWrite 45.6
97% 76.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
122% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 34.1%
Great: 39%
WDC WD40 EZRZ-00GXCB0 4TB
2GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 76.2
Write 83.6
Mixed 61.9
95% 73.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
77% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 14% Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
54.5% Above average
MC Read 20.8
MC Write 19.3
MC Mixed 16.9
54% 19 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 15.8
SC Mixed 15.2
41% 14.4 GB/s
Latency 62.5
64% 62.5 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H97-D3H-CF Builds (Compare 1,382 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H97-D3H-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $415
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $230Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback