Today's hottest deals

Micro F7BSC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics53% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive285% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemMicro F7BSC  (all builds)
MotherboardShenzhen F7BSC
Memory23.9 GB free of 32 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230717
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 12 '23 at 23:13
Run Duration246 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
FP8, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
99.8% Outstanding
Memory 71.8
1-Core 173
2-Core 346
102% 197 Pts
4-Core 682
8-Core 1284
117% 983 Pts
64-Core 1,616
100% 1,616 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 99.8%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon 780M
AMD(1002 0124) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 22.40.03.38
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
53% Above average
Lighting 61
Reflection 25.9
Parallax 97.5
50% 61.5 fps
MRender 28.1
Gravity 76.4
Splatting 99.6
60% 68 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 53%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0 1TB
860GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ELFK0S.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2420 2505 2485 2178 713 713 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
285% Outstanding
Read 1,325
Write 2434
Mixed 1,910
SusWrite 1,836
427% 1,876 MB/s
4K Read 56.7
4K Write 148
4K Mixed 78.5
265% 94.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,226
DQ Write 469
DQ Mixed 1,226
807% 974 MB/s
Poor: 195%
This bench: 285%
Great: 415%
Samsung 970 EVO Plus 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 1.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 706 152 6.5 350 0 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
87.4% Excellent
Read 549
Write 441
Mixed 432
SusWrite 255
94% 419 MB/s
4K Read 31.3
4K Write 54.9
4K Mixed 37.7
125% 41.3 MB/s
DQ Read 241
DQ Write 250
DQ Mixed 0.1
68% 164 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 87.4%
Great: 87%
WD My Passport 25E2 4TB
3.5TB free, PID 25e2
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 105 105 105 104 105 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
65.8% Good
Read 110
Write 100
Mixed 72.1
SusWrite 105
130% 97 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 8.7
4K Mixed 0.7
323% 3.47 MB/s
DQ Read 0.4
DQ Write 10.9
DQ Mixed 0.6
393% 3.97 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston CBD56S46BS8HA-16 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 5600 MHz
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
149% Outstanding
MC Read 48.8
MC Write 61.7
MC Mixed 50.1
153% 53.5 GB/s
SC Read 45.8
SC Write 60.9
SC Mixed 50.7
150% 52.5 GB/s
Latency 97.4
41% 97.4 ns
Poor: 85%
This bench: 149%
Great: 162%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 75 21.7" 1280 720 GSM5B55 LG FULL HD
Typical F7BSC Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

System: Micro F7BSC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $230Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback