Today's hottest deals

Asus G750JM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics16.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive87.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus G750JM  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK G750JM
Memory8.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140717
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 11 '23 at 21:55
Run Duration208 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4700HQ-$370
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
58.7% Above average
Memory 68
1-Core 87.5
2-Core 158
60% 104 Pts
4-Core 267
8-Core 435
43% 351 Pts
64-Core 409
25% 409 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 860M
Asus(1043 157D) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.3640
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
16.2% Very poor
Lighting 20.1
Reflection 23.8
Parallax 19.2
16% 21 fps
MRender 23.5
Gravity 21.3
Splatting 15.4
16% 20.1 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 16.2%
Great: 17%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX200 500GB-$90
332GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 352 335 340 343 348 347 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
87.6% Excellent
Read 398
Write 440
Mixed 298
SusWrite 344
83% 370 MB/s
4K Read 25
4K Write 74.1
4K Mixed 34.4
121% 44.5 MB/s
DQ Read 256
DQ Write 333
DQ Mixed 160
158% 250 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 87.6%
Great: 105%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$80
635GB free
Firmware: M3CR046
SusWrite @10s intervals: 358 360 367 375 382 384 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
97.7% Outstanding
Read 370
Write 439
Mixed 366
SusWrite 371
87% 387 MB/s
4K Read 33.9
4K Write 67.9
4K Mixed 44.7
145% 48.8 MB/s
DQ Read 328
DQ Write 345
DQ Mixed 158
168% 277 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 97.7%
Great: 125%
Samsung 970 EVO Plus 2TB
842GB free
Firmware: 1.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 122 105 108 110 110 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
52.4% Above average
Read 345
Write 373
Mixed 264
SusWrite 109
61% 273 MB/s
4K Read 22.7
4K Write 36.1
4K Mixed 28
89% 28.9 MB/s
DQ Read 57.8
DQ Write 119
DQ Mixed 71.1
59% 82.7 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 87%
Hitachi HTS725050A9A364 500GB
203GB free
Firmware: 0009
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 73 101 102 103 103 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
52.8% Above average
Read 87.4
Write 83.6
Mixed 43
SusWrite 96.8
57% 77.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
132% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 58%
TOSHIBA DT01ACA200 2TB
875GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 56 54 54 55 55 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
37.6% Below average
Read 126
Write 114
Mixed 31.8
SusWrite 54.7
102% 81.9 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.7
106% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 37.6%
Great: 52%
HGST HMS 5C4040BLE640 4TB
1TB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.3 1.2 1.4 0.6 0.1 0.1 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
19.1% Very poor
Read 86.9
Write 82.7
Mixed 15.2
SusWrite 0.8
54% 46.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
91% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 19.1%
Great: 37%
Hitachi HDS723020BLE640 2TB
644GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 56 53 54 55 55 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
34.8% Below average
Read 125
Write 119
Mixed 66.6
SusWrite 54.6
117% 91.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
76% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 34.8%
Great: 36%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 3x4GB
3 of 4 slots used
12GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
29.2% Poor
MC Read 10.4
MC Write 9.5
MC Mixed 9.3
28% 9.73 GB/s
SC Read 8.6
SC Write 9.3
SC Mixed 10.2
27% 9.37 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 29.2%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 31.5" 1280 720 ACI32FA ASUS VA325
Typical G750JM Builds (Compare 483 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus G750JM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Above average Total price: $510
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $230Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback