PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
Graphics | 79.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
Boot Drive | 412% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
Memory | 64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows. |
Motherboard | Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (all builds) |
Memory | 56.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 11 |
BIOS Date | 20220224 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jul 14 '23 at 16:35 |
Run Duration | 247 Seconds |
Run User | GBR-User |
Background CPU | 23% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
84.2%
Excellent
|
||||
Graphics Cards | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1650-$143
Gigabyte(1458 4026) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 511.79
Performing below potential (48th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
42.1%
Average
|
|||
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 511.79
|
79.6%
Very good
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial P5 Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$186
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: P7CR402 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2583 3001 3025 2959 2876 2966 MB/s
|
412%
Outstanding
|
|||
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
169GB free
Firmware: EMT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 48 50 48 47 48 MB/s
|
39.4%
Below average
|
|||
Amd-raid Array 3 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 47 48 47 47 47 MB/s
|
42.1%
Average
|
|||
Amd-raid Array 1 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 43 44 43 43 43 MB/s
|
40%
Average
|
|||
Amd-raid Array 4 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 42 44 43 43 43 MB/s
|
39.1%
Below average
|
|||
Seagate FA GoFlex Desk 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 5071
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 39 40 40 40 40 MB/s
|
16.8%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial CT32G4DFD832A.M16FF CT32G4DFD8266.C16FE 63GB
2666, 2666 MHz
32767, 32767 MB
|
79.2%
Very good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $159Bench 86%, 635,419 samples | 1,340x |
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $130Bench 96%, 383,420 samples | 895x |
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $151Bench 98%, 65,928 samples | 858x |
GPU | |
---|---|
RTX 3070Nvidia $470Bench 148%, 619,642 samples | 589x |
RTX 3080Nvidia $747Bench 187%, 424,051 samples | 527x |
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $275Bench 115%, 663,603 samples | 415x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 92% - Outstanding | Total price: $908 |