Today's hottest deals

Megaport PCA100-157425

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 105%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics29.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMegaport PCA100-157425  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK PRIME B550-PLUS
Memory27.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1600 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201203
Uptime11.5 Days
Run DateOct 01 '21 at 18:26
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$125
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Memory 91
1-Core 160
2-Core 320
103% 190 Pts
4-Core 634
8-Core 912
97% 773 Pts
64-Core 1,170
72% 1,170 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 105%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29.6% Poor
Lighting 37.4
Reflection 42.1
Parallax 38.8
30% 39.4 fps
MRender 38.2
Gravity 39
Splatting 28
28% 35.1 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 29.6%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$74
118GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,684
Write 2,112
Mixed 1,744
414% 1,847 MB/s
4K Read 64.5
4K Write 191
4K Mixed 91.4
316% 116 MB/s
DQ Read 1,330
DQ Write 1,191
DQ Mixed 1,229
930% 1,250 MB/s
Poor: 144% Great: 295%
Amd-raid Array 1 2TB
63GB free
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 55 56 57 57 57 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
30.7% Below average
Read 49.8
Write 57.8
Mixed 64.1
SusWrite 56.2
43% 57 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 0.1
101% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 30.7%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
93.9% Outstanding
MC Read 40.1
MC Write 24
MC Mixed 35.3
95% 33.1 GB/s
SC Read 31.4
SC Write 24
SC Mixed 37.2
88% 30.9 GB/s
Latency 65.8
61% 65.8 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 93.9%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback