Today's hottest deals

Asus X550CL

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.71% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus X550CL  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X550CL
Memory1.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140515
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 05 '23 at 22:29
Run Duration207 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 33%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3537U
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
52% Above average
Memory 77.2
1-Core 66.5
2-Core 117
54% 86.8 Pts
4-Core 156
8-Core 165
21% 160 Pts
64-Core 164
10% 164 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 52%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Asus(1043 124D) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
2.71% Terrible
Lighting 3.6
Reflection 4.5
Parallax 2
3% 3.37 fps
MRender 3.3
Gravity 1.8
Splatting 3.1
2% 2.73 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.71%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Trust HDD 2.5" 480GB
447GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 339 334 331 101 98 100 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
52.1% Above average
Read 368
Write 320
Mixed 296
SusWrite 217
67% 300 MB/s
4K Read 17.4
4K Write 27
4K Mixed 18.4
64% 20.9 MB/s
DQ Read 107
DQ Write 85
DQ Mixed 101
74% 97.7 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 52%
Hitachi HTS545050A7E680 500GB
232GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GG2OAF10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 63 72 70 58 63 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
40% Below average
Read 74.4
Write 65.5
Mixed 30.5
SusWrite 64.8
43% 58.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
100% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 40%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida EBJ40UG8EFU0 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
27.5% Poor
MC Read 9.7
MC Write 8.8
MC Mixed 8
25% 8.83 GB/s
SC Read 8.7
SC Write 9
SC Mixed 8.4
25% 8.7 GB/s
Latency 85.9
47% 85.9 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 27.5%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X550CL Builds (Compare 474 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X550CL

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback