Today's hottest deals

Apple MacBookPro16,1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (96th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 4 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics36.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive34.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemApple MacBookPro16,1  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-E1008331FDC96864
Memory28.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3072 x 1920 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201030
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 22 '20 at 09:49
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
88.1% Excellent
Memory 83.5
1-Core 139
2-Core 258
89% 160 Pts
4-Core 498
8-Core 751
78% 625 Pts
64-Core 849
52% 849 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 88.1%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Pro 5300M
Apple(106B 0210) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.10.36.01
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
36.9% Below average
Lighting 46.3
Reflection 35.4
Parallax 74.9
38% 52.2 fps
MRender 35.5
Gravity 44
Splatting 47.6
35% 42.4 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 36.9%
Great: 37%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Trust HDD 2.5" 480GB
109GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 206 27 158 95 183 148 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
34.5% Below average
Read 311
Write 302
Mixed 252
SusWrite 136
56% 250 MB/s
4K Read 8.3
4K Write 16.3
4K Mixed 9.7
34% 11.4 MB/s
DQ Read 92.1
DQ Write 56.1
DQ Mixed 31.9
35% 60 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 34.5%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMAA2GS6CMR8K-VK 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
89.4% Excellent
MC Read 33.7
MC Write 34.5
MC Mixed 27.9
92% 32 GB/s
SC Read 18.8
SC Write 37.5
SC Mixed 26.5
79% 27.6 GB/s
Latency 74.3
54% 74.3 ns
Poor: 75%
This bench: 89.4%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MacBookPro16,1 Builds (Compare 75 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

System: Apple MacBookPro16,1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback