Today's hottest deals

Samsung 900X3G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics2.04% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive47.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
15 months ago, 15 months ago.
SystemSamsung 900X3G  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP900X3G-KD1BR
Memory0.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20141031
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateJun 30 '23 at 21:23
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4200U-$281
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
29.2% Poor
Memory 46.4
1-Core 31.2
2-Core 43.1
27% 40.2 Pts
4-Core 71.7
8-Core 68.7
9% 70.2 Pts
64-Core 87.1
5% 87.1 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 29.2%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Sanyo(144D C109) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4549
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
2.04% Terrible
Lighting 2.3
Reflection 1.4
Parallax 3.3
2% 2.33 fps
MRender 4.3
Gravity 1.7
Splatting 2.8
2% 2.93 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.04%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
MZMPC128HBFU-000KN 128GB
42GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXM13K1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 162 171 174 178 175 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
47.1% Average
Read 323
Write 218
Mixed 164
SusWrite 174
49% 220 MB/s
4K Read 13.6
4K Write 30.2
4K Mixed 15.8
57% 19.9 MB/s
DQ Read 194
DQ Write 78.5
DQ Mixed 117
92% 130 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 47.1%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M481B5674QH0-YK0 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
25.3% Poor
MC Read 8.5
MC Write 9.8
MC Mixed 9.4
26% 9.23 GB/s
SC Read 4.5
SC Write 5.7
SC Mixed 7.1
16% 5.77 GB/s
Latency 175
23% 175 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 25.3%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 900X3G Builds (Compare 22 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 900X3G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 42% - Average Total price: $281
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback