Today's hottest deals

Samsung 900X3C/900X3D/900X3E/900X4C/900X4D

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.31% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive40.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemSamsung 900X3C/900X3D/900X3E/900X4C/900X4D  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP900X3D-AD1BR
Memory0.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150715
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 12 '20 at 18:54
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2537M
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.4 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
44.4% Average
Memory 73.8
1-Core 48.1
2-Core 40.8
40% 54.2 Pts
4-Core 92.5
8-Core 80.9
12% 86.7 Pts
64-Core 88.8
6% 88.8 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 44.4%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
Sanyo(144D C0D3) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
1.31% Terrible
Lighting 1.43
Reflection 1.88
Parallax 1
1% 1.44 fps
MRender 2.14
Gravity 0.8
Splatting 2.61
2% 1.85 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.31%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
MZMPC128HBFU-000KN 128GB
18GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXM12K1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 138 124 127 120 95 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
40.8% Average
Read 304
Write 187
Mixed 191
SusWrite 126
45% 202 MB/s
4K Read 11.4
4K Write 21
4K Mixed 14.3
47% 15.6 MB/s
DQ Read 221
DQ Write 64.3
DQ Mixed 112
90% 132 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 40.8%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida EBJ40UG8BBU0-GN-F 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
18.1% Very poor
MC Read 5.7
MC Write 5.8
MC Mixed 5.3
16% 5.6 GB/s
SC Read 4.4
SC Write 6
SC Mixed 3.6
13% 4.67 GB/s
Latency 92.8
43% 92.8 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 18.1%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 900X3C/900X3D/900X3E/900X4C/900X4D Builds (Compare 142 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 900X3C/900X3D/900X3E/900X4C/900X4D

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Above average Total price: $225
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback