Today's hottest deals

Supermicro SYS-7049A-T

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive76.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory384GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 384GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemSupermicro SYS-7049A-T  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X11DAi-N
Memory358.1 GB free of 384 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 640 x 480 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180703
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 26 '23 at 16:34
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Platinum 8160
CPU1, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 48 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
62.2% Good
Memory 69.2
1-Core 68.2
2-Core 128
53% 88.4 Pts
4-Core 297
8-Core 585
52% 441 Pts
64-Core 2,243
139% 2,243 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 62.2%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$100
57GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 336 332 329 331 334 329 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
76.3% Very good
Read 418
Write 394
Mixed 320
SusWrite 332
82% 366 MB/s
4K Read 20.8
4K Write 38.5
4K Mixed 27.1
87% 28.8 MB/s
DQ Read 295
DQ Write 254
DQ Mixed 267
202% 272 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 137%
Intel SSDPEKKF256G8 256GB
1GB free
Firmware: 004P
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,251
Write 994
Mixed 648
213% 964 MB/s
4K Read 36.5
4K Write 55.2
4K Mixed 42.5
139% 44.7 MB/s
DQ Read 492
DQ Write 306
DQ Mixed 410
303% 403 MB/s
Poor: 126% Great: 263%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 10TB
837GB free
Firmware: D781
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 160 160 158 163 162 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 18% Great: 102%
WD Elements 25A3 10TB
5TB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 178 182 182 171 186 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
78.7% Very good
Read 170
Write 182
Mixed 128
SusWrite 180
225% 165 MB/s
4K Read 3
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 1.4
215% 3 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 78.7%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A4K40CB2-CTD 12x31.9GB
12 of 16 slots used
383GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
138% Outstanding
MC Read 57.2
MC Write 67.1
MC Mixed 52
168% 58.8 GB/s
SC Read 5.5
SC Write 6
SC Mixed 6
17% 5.83 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 90%
This bench: 138%
Great: 162%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SYS-7049A-T Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 72%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 89%
Aircraft carrier

System: Supermicro SYS-7049A-T

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $265
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback