Today's hottest deals

Supermicro X11DPG-OT

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive230% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory384GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 384GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemSupermicro X11DPG-OT  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X11DPG-OT-CPU
Memory365.3 GB free of 384 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200221
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 13 '20 at 13:23
Run Duration215 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Platinum 8156
CPU1, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
78.4% Very good
Memory 73.4
1-Core 117
2-Core 233
78% 141 Pts
4-Core 448
8-Core 692
70% 570 Pts
64-Core 1,229
76% 1,229 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 78.4%
Great: 80%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDPE2MX020T4F 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 8DV1FF02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1505 1539 1561 1571 1547 1610 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
230% Outstanding
Read 663
Write 1,584
Mixed 690
SusWrite 1,556
256% 1,123 MB/s
4K Read 32
4K Write 191
4K Mixed 48.3
211% 90.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,108
DQ Write 900
DQ Mixed 1018
758% 1,009 MB/s
Poor: 156%
This bench: 230%
Great: 274%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2942 3043 3029 3076 3051 2995 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
286% Outstanding
Read 860
Write 2894
Mixed 863
SusWrite 3,023
438% 1,910 MB/s
4K Read 20
4K Write 50.8
4K Mixed 30
96% 33.6 MB/s
DQ Read 907
DQ Write 790
DQ Mixed 857
640% 851 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 286%
Great: 487%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 64GB-$14
56GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 25 22 22 25 22 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
22.9% Poor
Read 111
Write 39.9
Mixed 22.6
SusWrite 21.7
52% 48.9 MB/s
4K Read 8.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
33% 2.93 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 22.9%
Great: 30%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A4K40CB2-CTD 12x31.9GB
12 of 24 slots used
383GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
89.6% Excellent
MC Read 38.4
MC Write 34.3
MC Mixed 38.1
106% 36.9 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 6.4
20% 6.93 GB/s
Latency 93.8
43% 93.8 ns
Poor: 90%
This bench: 89.6%
Great: 162%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback