Today's hottest deals

QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 70%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics104% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory13GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 13GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory9.5 GB free of 13 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220202
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 05 '23 at 00:40
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 24%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 6-Core
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 5 cores, 10 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
75.9% Very good
Memory 71.2
1-Core 125
2-Core 239
79% 145 Pts
4-Core 433
8-Core 679
68% 556 Pts
64-Core 757
47% 757 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 75.9%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$270
Nvidia(10DE 12B0) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 535.98
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
104% Outstanding
Lighting 132
Reflection 133
Parallax 137
107% 134 fps
MRender 143
Gravity 122
Splatting 105
99% 123 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 104%
Great: 134%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 1TB
822GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 158 146 163 181 201 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 191
Write 181
Mixed 80.2
SusWrite 162
112% 154 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 1
152% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 101%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 1x13GB
1 of 1 slots used
13GB DIMM RAM
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
73.5% Very good
MC Read 31.2
MC Write 17.9
MC Mixed 30.5
76% 26.5 GB/s
SC Read 20.7
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 28.8
64% 22.4 GB/s
Latency 98.6
41% 98.6 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 73.5%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 620 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $499
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $148
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $315Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback