Today's hottest deals

QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 78%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics92.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory11.7GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 11.7GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory6.7 GB free of 11.7188 GB @ 0 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20150206
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 06 '21 at 02:47
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD EPYC-Rome
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 5 cores, 10 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
90.9% Outstanding
Memory 83.1
1-Core 116
2-Core 289
87% 163 Pts
4-Core 529
8-Core 908
87% 718 Pts
64-Core 1,002
62% 1,002 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 90.9%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$140
Gigabyte(1458 3FC1) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 471.11
Performing below potential (72nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
92.2% Outstanding
Lighting 116
Reflection 109
Parallax 112
94% 112 fps
MRender 136
Gravity 101
Splatting 92.9
88% 110 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 92.2%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 1TB
229GB free
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 54 54 42 39 42 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
31.8% Below average
Read 62.6
Write 66.2
Mixed 62.8
SusWrite 47.8
45% 59.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 1
172% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 31.8%
Great: 101%
Qemu HARDDISK 140GB
41GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.5+
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 2,156
Write 1,731
Mixed 1,628
1,378% 1,838 MB/s
4K Read 50.1
4K Write 48.8
4K Mixed 39.8
7,413% 46.2 MB/s
DQ Read 140
DQ Write 145
DQ Mixed 101
1,048% 129 MB/s
Poor: 24% Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 1x11GB
1 of 1 slots used
11GB DIMM RAM
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
90.8% Outstanding
MC Read 38.1
MC Write 24
MC Mixed 35.8
93% 32.6 GB/s
SC Read 25.9
SC Write 23.3
SC Mixed 34.2
79% 27.8 GB/s
Latency 74.9
53% 74.9 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 90.8%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 10 8 200 29.5" 1280 720 SPT0BCC Sceptre P30
Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 620 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $499
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $148
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $315Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback