Today's hottest deals

Acer Aspire M1930

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 20%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.01% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire M1930  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire M1930
Memory0.6 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1280 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110504
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 03 '17 at 11:27
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G620-$30
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
40.5% Average
Memory 58.9
1-Core 67
2-Core 131
50% 85.7 Pts
4-Core 136
8-Core 105
17% 121 Pts
64-Core 126
8% 126 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 40.5%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)
Acer(1025 0589) 785MB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2353
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.01% Terrible
Lighting 1.07
Reflection 1.46
Parallax 1.5
1% 1.34 fps
MRender 1.76
Gravity 0.3
Splatting 2.39
1% 1.48 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.01%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$22
195GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 17.01H17 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
43.8% Average
Read 74.9
Write 77.5
Mixed 35.1
46% 62.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.51
4K Mixed 0.31
91% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 69%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$22
70GB free
Firmware: 17.01H17 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
56.7% Above average
Read 96.9
Write 101
Mixed 15.9
52% 71.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.65
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.29
89% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR128X64D3U1333C9 2x1GB
2 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR3 1067 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
37.3% Below average
MC Read 12.9
MC Write 14
MC Mixed 12.6
38% 13.2 GB/s
SC Read 10.6
SC Write 11.7
SC Mixed 11.1
32% 11.1 GB/s
Latency 131
30% 131 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 37.3%
Great: 37%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire M1930 Builds (Compare 102 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire M1930

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $49
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback