Today's hottest deals

ACER Aspire X1900

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 9%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 22.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.37% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemACER Aspire X1900  (all builds)
MotherboardACER Aspire X1900
Memory0.4 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1280 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100423
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateMar 16 '21 at 19:59
Run Duration183 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron 450
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
22.8% Poor
Memory 43.3
1-Core 9.6
2-Core 5
17% 19.3 Pts
4-Core 16.1
8-Core 16.9
2% 16.5 Pts
64-Core 16.9
1% 16.9 Pts
Poor: 13%
This bench: 22.8%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel G41 Express Chipset
Acer(1025 0390) 783MB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2702
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.37% Terrible
Lighting 0.4
Reflection 0.7
Parallax 0.5
0% 0.53 fps
MRender 0.6
Gravity 0.3
Splatting 0.7
0% 0.53 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.37%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HDT721050SLA360 500GB-$66
440GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ST3OA31B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 80 34 49 60 49 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
22.7% Poor
Read 25
Write 38.8
Mixed 38.5
SusWrite 54
29% 39.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
108% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 22.7%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR128X64D3U1333C9 2x1GB
2 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR3 800 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
7.3% Terrible
MC Read 3.2
MC Write 2.1
MC Mixed 1.9
7% 2.4 GB/s
SC Read 0.5
SC Write 1.2
SC Mixed 0.2
2% 0.63 GB/s
Latency 188
21% 188 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 7.3%
Great: 37%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire X1900 Builds (Compare 27 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: ACER Aspire X1900

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 47% - Average Total price: $83
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback