Today's hottest deals

HP EliteDesk 705 G3 SFF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics7.28% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive47.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP EliteDesk 705 G3 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8265
Memory3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221214
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateApr 23 '23 at 13:32
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD PRO A12-8870 R7, 12 COMPUTE CORES 4C+8G
U4500, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
36.4% Below average
Memory 45.2
1-Core 71.6
2-Core 122
45% 79.6 Pts
4-Core 157
8-Core 178
22% 167 Pts
64-Core 184
11% 184 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 36.4%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
HP(103C 8265) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
7.28% Terrible
Lighting 8.9
Reflection 7.9
Parallax 16.9
7% 11.2 fps
MRender 4.6
Gravity 13.5
Splatting 8.6
7% 8.9 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 7.28%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 2.5 240GB
123GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 42051100
SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 204 106 113 117 125 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
47.3% Average
Read 288
Write 248
Mixed 267
SusWrite 143
53% 237 MB/s
4K Read 15.1
4K Write 30.7
4K Mixed 18.2
62% 21.3 MB/s
DQ Read 216
DQ Write 130
DQ Mixed 43.4
67% 130 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 76%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$33
460GB free
Firmware: JC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 117 123 126 127 128 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
72.3% Very good
Read 129
Write 120
Mixed 69.5
SusWrite 123
81% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
162% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 72.3%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown - [0x8000] KF2400DDCD4 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
19.7% Very poor
MC Read 8
MC Write 6.4
MC Mixed 6.9
20% 7.1 GB/s
SC Read 3.5
SC Write 4.5
SC Mixed 4.7
12% 4.23 GB/s
Latency 180
22% 180 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 19.7%
Great: 20%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteDesk 705 G3 SFF Builds (Compare 203 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteDesk 705 G3 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback