Today's hottest deals

HP EliteDesk 705 G3 SFF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 22.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics7.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive44.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (69%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP EliteDesk 705 G3 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8265
Memory2.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180803
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 22 '23 at 08:55
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU 69%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD PRO A12-8870 R7, 12 COMPUTE CORES 4C+8G
U4500, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
22.5% Poor
Memory 20.8
1-Core 67.1
2-Core 116
35% 67.8 Pts
4-Core 138
8-Core 152
19% 145 Pts
64-Core 156
10% 156 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 22.5%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
HP(103C 8265) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 19.20
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
7.9% Terrible
Lighting 10.1
Reflection 9.9
Parallax 14.5
8% 11.5 fps
MRender 4.3
Gravity 14.1
Splatting 8.1
7% 8.83 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 7.9%
Great: 8%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 2.5 240GB
173GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 42051100
SusWrite @10s intervals: 199 126 52 38 80 93 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
44.5% Average
Read 328
Write 289
Mixed 295
SusWrite 98.2
56% 253 MB/s
4K Read 15.6
4K Write 26.9
4K Mixed 15.9
58% 19.5 MB/s
DQ Read 208
DQ Write 130
DQ Mixed 49.6
69% 129 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown - [0x8000] KF2400DDCD4 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
18.1% Very poor
MC Read 7.8
MC Write 6.2
MC Mixed 6.8
20% 6.93 GB/s
SC Read 2.7
SC Write 3.4
SC Mixed 3.6
9% 3.23 GB/s
Latency 315
13% 315 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 18.1%
Great: 20%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteDesk 705 G3 SFF Builds (Compare 203 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteDesk 705 G3 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $78
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback