Today's hottest deals

Intel NUC12EDBi7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 110%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 109%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 120%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 110%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics99.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive323% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemIntel(R) NUC12DCMi7
MotherboardIntel NUC12EDBi7  (all builds)
Memory27.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211220
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 01 '23 at 02:24
Run Duration240 Seconds
Run User NZL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
110% Outstanding
Memory 80.7
1-Core 187
2-Core 373
112% 214 Pts
4-Core 744
8-Core 1,400
128% 1,072 Pts
64-Core 2,148
133% 2,148 Pts
Poor: 100%
This bench: 110%
Great: 115%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$280
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing below potential (49th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
99.7% Outstanding
Lighting 130
Reflection 119
Parallax 122
106% 124 fps
MRender 142
Gravity 102
Splatting 88.4
88% 111 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 99.7%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$79
416GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2320 793 791 792 791 790 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
323% Outstanding
Read 2487
Write 2,328
Mixed 1,839
SusWrite 1,046
431% 1,925 MB/s
4K Read 63.3
4K Write 177
4K Mixed 99
317% 113 MB/s
DQ Read 1,517
DQ Write 1,195
DQ Mixed 1,323
999% 1,345 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 323%
Great: 346%
Samsung SSD 870 EVO 500G 500GB
186GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.3 0 0 0.4 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
134% Outstanding
Read 376
Write 385
Mixed 365
SusWrite 0.2
364% 282 MB/s
4K Read 20.8
4K Write 24.1
4K Mixed 22
1,645% 22.3 MB/s
DQ Read 23.2
DQ Write 29.7
DQ Mixed 25.5
1,964% 26.1 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 134%
Great: 181%
KINGSTON SA400S37480G 480GB
447GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 327 267 352 283 352 279 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
142% Outstanding
Read 195
Write 97.1
Mixed 84.7
SusWrite 310
230% 172 MB/s
4K Read 9.7
4K Write 14.1
4K Mixed 9.1
825% 11 MB/s
DQ Read 8.4
DQ Write 13.6
DQ Mixed 10.4
848% 10.8 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 142%
Great: 173%
WDC WD64 00AAKS-41H2B0 640GB
596GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 106 106 106 106 106 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
43.7% Average
Read 101
Write 102
Mixed 67
SusWrite 106
127% 93.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
98% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 44%
Samsung SSD 870 EVO 1TB
931GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 106 106 105 106 106 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
158% Outstanding
Read 381
Write 402
Mixed 370
SusWrite 106
416% 315 MB/s
4K Read 21.9
4K Write 24.4
4K Mixed 23
1,693% 23.1 MB/s
DQ Read 23.1
DQ Write 31.3
DQ Mixed 25.2
2,007% 26.5 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 158%
Great: 181%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT32G4SFD832A.M16FF 1x31GB
1 of 2 slots used
31GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
58.6% Above average
MC Read 20.7
MC Write 20.6
MC Mixed 19.3
58% 20.2 GB/s
SC Read 17.2
SC Write 22.3
SC Mixed 19.3
56% 19.6 GB/s
Latency 79.2
50% 79.2 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical NUC12EDBi7 Builds (Compare 103 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Intel NUC12EDBi7

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $230Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback