Today's hottest deals

Intel NUC12EDBi7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 131%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 108%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 144%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 109%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics122% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive345% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
18 months ago, 18 months ago.
SystemIntel(R) NUC12DCMi7
MotherboardIntel NUC12EDBi7  (all builds)
Memory27.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211220
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 13 '23 at 01:47
Run Duration226 Seconds
Run User NZL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Memory 77
1-Core 188
2-Core 377
111% 214 Pts
4-Core 756
8-Core 1,386
128% 1,071 Pts
64-Core 2,122
131% 2,122 Pts
Poor: 100%
This bench: 109%
Great: 115%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6750-XT
Sapphire(1DA2 465E) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 12GB, Driver: 23.4.1
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
122% Outstanding
Lighting 140
Reflection 25.3
Parallax 86.7
114% 84.1 fps
MRender 202
Gravity 155
Splatting 204
154% 187 fps
Poor: 124%
This bench: 122%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$79
373GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2280 775 787 794 798 794 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
345% Outstanding
Read 2,594
Write 2,424
Mixed 1,783
SusWrite 1,038
438% 1,960 MB/s
4K Read 71.5
4K Write 159
4K Mixed 104
326% 112 MB/s
DQ Read 1,814
DQ Write 1,595
DQ Mixed 1,675
1,264% 1,695 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 345%
Great: 346%
Samsung SSD 870 EVO 500G 500GB
251GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.2 0.1 0 0.1 0.2 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
142% Outstanding
Read 390
Write 400
Mixed 375
SusWrite 0.3
376% 291 MB/s
4K Read 25
4K Write 26
4K Mixed 25.4
1,841% 25.5 MB/s
DQ Read 26
DQ Write 26
DQ Mixed 25.9
1,862% 26 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 142%
Great: 181%
KINGSTON SA400S37480G 480GB
447GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 180 174 172 173 170 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
160% Outstanding
Read 260
Write 288
Mixed 243
SusWrite 178
328% 242 MB/s
4K Read 16.1
4K Write 25.9
4K Mixed 18.9
1,584% 20.3 MB/s
DQ Read 17.2
DQ Write 26
DQ Mixed 19.3
1,605% 20.8 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 160%
Great: 173%
Samsung SSD 870 EVO 1TB
931GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 180 173 171 173 170 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
181% Outstanding
Read 390
Write 401
Mixed 373
SusWrite 177
447% 335 MB/s
4K Read 25
4K Write 26
4K Mixed 25.4
1,841% 25.5 MB/s
DQ Read 26
DQ Write 26
DQ Mixed 25.9
1,862% 26 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 181%
Great: 181%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT32G4SFD832A.M16FF 1x31GB
1 of 2 slots used
31GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
49% Average
MC Read 16.9
MC Write 17.3
MC Mixed 16
48% 16.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 18.4
SC Mixed 15.4
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 86.3
46% 86.3 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 49%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical NUC12EDBi7 Builds (Compare 103 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Intel NUC12EDBi7

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $230Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback