Today's hottest deals

Casper NIRVANA DESKTOP

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.89% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive31.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (49%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemCasper NIRVANA DESKTOP  (all builds)
MotherboardCASPER CASPER NIRVANA DESKTOP
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140519
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 12 '23 at 17:58
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 49%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4130-$41
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
54.8% Above average
Memory 73.5
1-Core 89.6
2-Core 134
60% 99.1 Pts
4-Core 211
8-Core 210
28% 211 Pts
64-Core 213
13% 213 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 54.8%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 440
Asus(1043 838A) 1GB
CLim: 822 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
3.89% Terrible
Lighting 4.6
Reflection 5.6
Parallax 1.5
4% 3.9 fps
MRender 7
Gravity 5.1
Splatting 3.8
4% 5.3 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.89%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 250GB
176GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V0718B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 84 87 111 95 72 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
31.8% Below average
Read 437
Write 226
Mixed 14
SusWrite 87.3
42% 191 MB/s
4K Read 19.7
4K Write 6.1
4K Mixed 0.5
34% 8.77 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 31.8%
Great: 89%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5403-159.A01LF 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
31.2% Below average
MC Read 11
MC Write 10.9
MC Mixed 9
29% 10.3 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 11.2
SC Mixed 10.3
29% 10.1 GB/s
Latency 93.6
43% 93.6 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 31.2%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical NIRVANA DESKTOP Builds (Compare 664 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Casper NIRVANA DESKTOP

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $188
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback