Today's hottest deals

Acer Aspire XC-605

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 31%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.45% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAcer Aspire XC-605  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire XC-605
Memory6.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130813
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 12 '22 at 18:31
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4130-$41
LGA1150, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
32% Below average
Memory 27
1-Core 70.3
2-Core 123
39% 73.4 Pts
4-Core 212
8-Core 219
29% 215 Pts
64-Core 220
14% 220 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 32%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)
Acer(1025 0750) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
2.45% Terrible
Lighting 2.7
Reflection 1.7
Parallax 3.8
2% 2.73 fps
MRender 3.6
Gravity 2.2
Splatting 4.6
3% 3.47 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.45%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 256GB
81GB free (System drive)
Firmware: H220115
SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 125 204 136 52 47 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 10% Great: 71%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
134GB free
Firmware: CC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 122 132 132 134 134 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
82.5% Excellent
Read 157
Write 116
Mixed 72.7
SusWrite 130
87% 119 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
159% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 82.5%
Great: 112%
Toshiba Notebook SSHD 2.5" 1TB
799GB free
Firmware: HEF01D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 99 107 106 106 107 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
58.6% Above average
Read 96.5
Write 103
Mixed 33.8
SusWrite 103
61% 84.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 16
4K Mixed 1.7
506% 6.07 MB/s
DQ Read 2
DQ Write 21
DQ Mixed 7
78% 10 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 64%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR16D3LU1KFG/4G 1302 PSD38G16002 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
14.7% Very poor
MC Read 5.8
MC Write 6.1
MC Mixed 3.8
15% 5.23 GB/s
SC Read 2.4
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 4.1
11% 3.77 GB/s
Latency 273
15% 273 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 14.7%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire XC-605 Builds (Compare 470 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire XC-605

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $235
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback