Today's hottest deals

Standard AHV

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 15%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (7th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 93 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 12.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics1.02% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive22.6% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (52%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
20 months ago, 20 months ago.
SystemStandard AHV  (all builds)
MotherboardINTEL HURONRIVER
Memory1.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110323
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateFeb 01 '23 at 15:03
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 52%

 PC Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2410M-$160
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
12.9% Very poor
Memory 20.4
1-Core 12.1
2-Core 26.6
13% 19.7 Pts
4-Core 31.2
8-Core 37.2
4% 34.2 Pts
64-Core 34.5
2% 34.5 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 12.9%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
Device(1297 2020) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
1.02% Terrible
Lighting 1.1
Reflection 0.7
Parallax 0.4
1% 0.73 fps
MRender 1.6
Gravity 0.8
Splatting 2
1% 1.47 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.02%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Xraydisk 120GB 120GB
28GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0227A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 23 40 33 19 40 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
22.6% Poor
Read 343
Write 308
Mixed 23.6
SusWrite 49.8
40% 181 MB/s
4K Read 10.5
4K Write 7.7
4K Mixed 1
21% 6.4 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 22.6%
Great: 78%
WDC WD50 00LPVX-60V0TT0 500GB
361GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 19 22 22 23 22 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
12.5% Very poor
Read 51.6
Write 22
Mixed 21.2
SusWrite 21.8
35% 29.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.7
28% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.5%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
11.2% Very poor
MC Read 3.8
MC Write 4
MC Mixed 4
11% 3.93 GB/s
SC Read 2.9
SC Write 2.7
SC Mixed 3
8% 2.87 GB/s
Latency 317
13% 317 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 11.2%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical AHV Builds (Compare 55 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Standard AHV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $160
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback