Today's hottest deals

Samsung RV419

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 25%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (8th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 92 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.93% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemSamsung RV419  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG RV419
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111219
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 24 '22 at 01:28
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2410M-$160
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
26.4% Poor
Memory 38.5
1-Core 19.8
2-Core 40
22% 32.8 Pts
4-Core 84.8
8-Core 82.4
11% 83.6 Pts
64-Core 77.7
5% 77.7 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 26.4%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
Sanyo(144D C641) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
0.93% Terrible
Lighting 1.1
Reflection 0.7
Parallax 0.5
1% 0.77 fps
MRender 1.6
Gravity 0.6
Splatting 1.4
1% 1.2 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.93%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80
13GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 274
Write 255
Mixed 253
58% 261 MB/s
4K Read 13.3
4K Write 16.5
4K Mixed 14.6
48% 14.8 MB/s
DQ Read 152
DQ Write 97.4
DQ Mixed 95.4
79% 115 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 115%
WD Green 2.5 480GB
446GB free
Firmware: 42051100
SusWrite @10s intervals: 227 140 211 176 137 164 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
38.1% Below average
Read 268
Write 273
Mixed 219
SusWrite 176
53% 234 MB/s
4K Read 11.2
4K Write 14.9
4K Mixed 10.9
39% 12.3 MB/s
DQ Read 117
DQ Write 93
DQ Mixed 70.5
62% 93.5 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 38.1%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
20.9% Poor
MC Read 7.8
MC Write 8.5
MC Mixed 7.4
23% 7.9 GB/s
SC Read 3.4
SC Write 3.4
SC Mixed 3.7
10% 3.5 GB/s
Latency 209
19% 209 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 20.9%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical RV419 Builds (Compare 16 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 20%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung RV419

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $133
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback