Today's hottest deals

Asus Z170 PRO GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics59.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive53.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus Z170 PRO GAMING  (all builds)
Memory28.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit farger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161227
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 15 '17 at 19:33
Run Duration270 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$85
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
94.6% Outstanding
Memory 96.4
1-Core 134
2-Core 268
93% 166 Pts
4-Core 500
8-Core 742
77% 621 Pts
64-Core 741
46% 741 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 94.6%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 382.5
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
59.9% Above average
Lighting 74.8
Reflection 75.1
Parallax 65.8
61% 71.9 fps
MRender 71.2
Gravity 69.4
Splatting 71
58% 70.5 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 830 128GB-$109
39GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXM03B1Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
53.1% Above average
Read 438
Write 154
Mixed 185
56% 259 MB/s
4K Read 18.2
4K Write 40.3
4K Mixed 13.4
66% 24 MB/s
DQ Read 250
DQ Write 43.2
DQ Mixed 32.2
53% 109 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 76%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2016)-$114
2TB free
Firmware: 0001 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
87.2% Excellent
Read 159
Write 145
Mixed 131
109% 145 MB/s
4K Read 0.71
4K Write 1.83
4K Mixed 0.22
88% 0.92 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 87.2%
Great: 105%
Seagate ST31000340AS 1TB-$136
768GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
39.1% Below average
Read 70.9
Write 65.3
Mixed 79.9
55% 72 MB/s
4K Read 0.35
4K Write 1.68
4K Mixed 0.38
88% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 39.1%
Great: 59%
Samsung HD753LJ 1TB
766GB free
Firmware: SD15 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
42.3% Average
Read 70.2
Write 77.2
Mixed 76.7
56% 74.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.42
4K Write 1.22
4K Mixed 0.31
75% 0.65 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 42.3%
Great: 75%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$69
317GB free
Firmware: CC24 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
99.6% Outstanding
Read 181
Write 166
Mixed 162
128% 170 MB/s
4K Read 0.96
4K Write 1.25
4K Mixed 0.33
100% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 99.6%
Great: 113%
WD WD10EACS-00D6B1 750GB
156GB free
Firmware: 1AA01113 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
44.8% Average
Read 78.2
Write 77.6
Mixed 84.4
60% 80 MB/s
4K Read 0.55
4K Write 1.94
4K Mixed 0.35
98% 0.95 MB/s
WD 3200BEV External 320GB
298GB free, PID 0704
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
20.3% Poor
Read 37.2
Write 40.8
Mixed 12.8
37% 30.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.55
4K Write 1.91
4K Mixed 0.26
76% 0.91 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 20.3%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB-$92
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
104% Outstanding
MC Read 38.5
MC Write 40
MC Mixed 31.2
104% 36.6 GB/s
SC Read 22
SC Write 44.1
SC Mixed 31.1
93% 32.4 GB/s
Latency 52.6
76% 52.6 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 104%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170 PRO GAMING Builds (Compare 14,555 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus Z170 PRO GAMING - $295

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $800
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback