Today's hottest deals

Asrock N68C-GS4 FX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics9.27% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock N68C-GS4 FX  (all builds)
Memory2.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150408
Uptime3.4 Days
Run DateSep 29 '17 at 11:15
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom 9650-$125
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
42.9% Average
Memory 62.8
1-Core 34.2
2-Core 68.2
36% 55.1 Pts
4-Core 135
8-Core 138
18% 136 Pts
64-Core 130
8% 130 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 5750
Sapphire(174B E148) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
9.27% Terrible
Lighting 12.2
Reflection 9.69
Parallax 10.1
10% 10.7 fps
MRender 9.14
Gravity 8.63
Splatting 11
8% 9.61 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 9.27%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung HD753LJ 1TB
461GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC43 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
74.7% Very good
Read 131
Write 129
Mixed 127
97% 129 MB/s
4K Read 0.98
4K Write 1.55
4K Mixed 0.32
105% 0.95 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 75%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 750GB-$60
334GB free
Firmware: 1AA0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
47.8% Average
Read 84.7
Write 81.3
Mixed 78.1
61% 81.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.76
4K Write 1.98
4K Mixed 0.33
105% 1.02 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 60%
BUFFALO HD-PCFU3 500GB
70GB free, PID 0240
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
13.1% Very poor
Read 23.7
Write 21.2
Mixed 20
27% 21.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.29
4K Write 1.61
4K Mixed 0.14
61% 0.68 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 13.1%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4GB
533, 533 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
19.7% Very poor
MC Read 7.2
MC Write 5.5
MC Mixed 7
19% 6.57 GB/s
SC Read 5
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 5.5
14% 5.03 GB/s
Latency 120
33% 120 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 19.7%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N68C-GS4 FX Builds (Compare 92 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock N68C-GS4 FX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $149
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback