Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 82N9

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 14%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (3rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 97 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 10.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics1.12% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive36.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 82N9  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory1.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220727
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 07 '23 at 13:54
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD 3015e Graphics
FT5, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 1.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
10.9% Very poor
Memory 9.51
1-Core 26.9
2-Core 39.9
14% 25.4 Pts
4-Core 70.8
8-Core 67.5
9% 69.2 Pts
64-Core 66.6
4% 66.6 Pts
Poor: 11%
This bench: 10.9%
Great: 39%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
Legend(17AA 3812) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 22.20.28
Relative performance (0th percentile)
1.12% Terrible
Lighting 1.1
Reflection 1.8
Parallax 1.5
1% 1.47 fps
MRender 2.1
Gravity 1.2
Splatting 2.3
2% 1.87 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.12%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZALQ256HBJD-00BL1 256GB
182GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 7L1QFXM7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 301 182 191 217 184 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
36.2% Below average
Read 281
Write 240
Mixed 255
SusWrite 211
56% 247 MB/s
4K Read 10.2
4K Write 9.6
4K Mixed 8.7
32% 9.5 MB/s
DQ Read 59.9
DQ Write 46.3
DQ Mixed 38
33% 48.1 MB/s
Poor: 91%
This bench: 36.2%
Great: 214%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G44AB0-CWE 1x8GB
1 of 1 slots used
8GB Row of chips DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
15.4% Very poor
MC Read 5
MC Write 6
MC Mixed 5.4
16% 5.47 GB/s
SC Read 4.6
SC Write 5.1
SC Mixed 4.8
14% 4.83 GB/s
Latency 408
10% 408 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 15.4%
Great: 40%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 82N9 Builds (Compare 58 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 82N9

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback