Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 82N9

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.8% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive77.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (58%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 82N9  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory3.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210526
Uptime60 Days
Run DateNov 15 '22 at 09:49
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 58%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD 3015e Graphics
FT5, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 1.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
39.4% Below average
Memory 58.9
1-Core 59
2-Core 91.3
43% 69.7 Pts
4-Core 116
8-Core 128
16% 122 Pts
64-Core 128
8% 128 Pts
Poor: 11%
This bench: 39.4%
Great: 39%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
Legend(17AA 3812) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.45.44
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
1.8% Terrible
Lighting 1.8
Reflection 2.5
Parallax 3
2% 2.43 fps
MRender 2.4
Gravity 2.1
Splatting 4
2% 2.83 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.8%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SKHynix_HFM256GD3HX015N 256GB
191GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 41030C20
SusWrite @10s intervals: 376 374 457 443 411 497 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
77.4% Very good
Read 396
Write 295
Mixed 518
SusWrite 426
92% 409 MB/s
4K Read 27.6
4K Write 34.7
4K Mixed 27.1
95% 29.8 MB/s
DQ Read 153
DQ Write 124
DQ Mixed 131
100% 136 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 77.4%
Great: 272%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G44AB0-CWE 1x8GB
1 of 1 slots used
8GB Row of chips DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
22.2% Poor
MC Read 6.7
MC Write 7.6
MC Mixed 8.2
21% 7.5 GB/s
SC Read 5.9
SC Write 6.2
SC Mixed 7.1
18% 6.4 GB/s
Latency 131
30% 131 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 22.2%
Great: 40%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 82N9 Builds (Compare 58 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 82N9

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback