Today's hottest deals

Asus ROG STRIX Z590-E GAMING WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics32.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive193% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX Z590-E GAMING WIFI  (all builds)
Memory46.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210421
Uptime5.6 Days
Run DateDec 06 '22 at 05:34
Run Duration276 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 39%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-10900K-$490
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
94.7% Outstanding
Memory 83.4
1-Core 147
2-Core 294
94% 175 Pts
4-Core 567
8-Core 1,127
100% 847 Pts
64-Core 1,932
120% 1,932 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 94.7%
Great: 106%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
32.5% Below average
Lighting 42.5
Reflection 41.2
Parallax 36.7
35% 40.1 fps
MRender 37.2
Gravity 42.2
Splatting 27.4
28% 35.6 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 32.5%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$75
556GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1776 664 558 382 610 429 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
193% Outstanding
Read 1,608
Write 1,900
Mixed 1,751
SusWrite 736
338% 1,499 MB/s
4K Read 45.9
4K Write 92.7
4K Mixed 60.3
196% 66.3 MB/s
DQ Read 572
DQ Write 420
DQ Mixed 518
381% 503 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 193%
Great: 365%
Toshiba HDWQ140 4TB
3TB free
Firmware: FJ1M
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 183 184 181 181 186 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 190
Write 195
Mixed 102
SusWrite 184
123% 168 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 0.8
226% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 107%
Great: 112%
Hitachi HDN724030ALE640 3TB
755GB free
Firmware: MJ8OA5E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 127 129 130 130 130 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
66.7% Good
Read 103
Write 104
Mixed 52.5
SusWrite 129
71% 97.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
152% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 88%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$77
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 136 137 136 136 136 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
77.4% Very good
Read 133
Write 134
Mixed 102
SusWrite 136
93% 126 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
195% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 77.4%
Great: 86%
H/W DISK 4 3TB
2.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 79 80 80 79 80 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
54.2% Above average
Read 182
Write 179
Mixed 83.4
SusWrite 79.8
168% 131 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 1
151% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 54%
H/W DISK 3 3TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.3 0.1 0 0 0 0.1 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
33.5% Below average
Read 178
Write 184
Mixed 83.3
SusWrite 0.1
137% 111 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
120% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 33.5%
Great: 50%
H/W DISK 1 6TB
5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 79 80 80 79 80 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
41% Average
Read 120
Write 108
Mixed 57
SusWrite 79.2
118% 91 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
105% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 41%
Great: 56%
Generic USB3.0 Device 6TB
4.5TB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 42 42 42 42 41 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
18.4% Very poor
Read 34.7
Write 36.4
Mixed 29.9
SusWrite 41.7
49% 35.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
79% 1.13 MB/s
H/W DISK 2 6TB
4.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 119 119 118 118 116 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
48.8% Average
Read 117
Write 116
Mixed 55
SusWrite 118
136% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
102% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F4-3200C16-16GVK Skill Intl F4-3200C16-16GVK Skill Intl F4-3200C16-16GVK Skill Intl F4-3200C16-16GVK 64GB
2667, 2133, 2667, 2133 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
77.1% Very good
MC Read 27.4
MC Write 29.9
MC Mixed 24.6
78% 27.3 GB/s
SC Read 16.2
SC Write 31.7
SC Mixed 24.9
69% 24.3 GB/s
Latency 74.5
54% 74.5 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 77.1%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX Z590-E GAMING WIFI Builds (Compare 8,965 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 190%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 191%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z590-E GAMING WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $1,111
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback