Today's hottest deals

HP Z440 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics29.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive88.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Z440 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 212B
Memory40.9 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200612
Uptime5.9 Days
Run DateDec 06 '23 at 09:45
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v3
CPU0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
74.8% Very good
Memory 84.1
1-Core 90.1
2-Core 188
70% 121 Pts
4-Core 353
8-Core 587
57% 470 Pts
64-Core 774
48% 774 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K5200
HP(103C 1095) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 875 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 462.59
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29.1% Poor
Lighting 32.5
Reflection 41.6
Parallax 47.1
26% 40.4 fps
MRender 51.5
Gravity 40.7
Splatting 35.6
34% 42.6 fps
Poor: 29%
This bench: 29.1%
Great: 34%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 500GB
58GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 299 307 303 302 303 299 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
88.4% Excellent
Read 490
Write 309
Mixed 289
SusWrite 302
78% 348 MB/s
4K Read 29.3
4K Write 89.2
4K Mixed 25.7
124% 48.1 MB/s
DQ Read 295
DQ Write 304
DQ Mixed 240
197% 280 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 88.4%
Great: 118%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$48
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 147 147 147 147 146 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
82.9% Excellent
Read 142
Write 145
Mixed 99.6
SusWrite 146
98% 133 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
195% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 82.9%
Great: 86%
H/W DISK 1 3TB
3TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 80 80 79 79 79 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
48.1% Average
Read 154
Write 149
Mixed 81.5
SusWrite 79.5
150% 116 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
129% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 60%
H/W DISK 2 3TB
3TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 80 80 79 79 79 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
48.4% Average
Read 157
Write 150
Mixed 88.6
SusWrite 77.4
153% 118 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1
133% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 72%
H/W DISK 3 3TB
3TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 80 80 79 79 79 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
50.1% Above average
Read 170
Write 164
Mixed 85.2
SusWrite 79.3
160% 125 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.9
123% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A1G40DB0-CPB M393A1G40DB0-CPB M393A1G40DB0-CPB M393A1G40DB0-CPB Micron 36ASF2G72PZ-2G1A2 48GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
78.2% Very good
MC Read 33.4
MC Write 25.2
MC Mixed 28.5
83% 29 GB/s
SC Read 15.1
SC Write 19.1
SC Mixed 21.1
53% 18.4 GB/s
Latency 74.4
54% 74.4 ns
Poor: 78%
This bench: 78.2%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 24.1" 1280 720 HWP309E HP Z24i
Typical Z440 Workstation Builds (Compare 6,327 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: HP Z440 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 9% - Terrible Total price: $440
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback