Today's hottest deals

HP Laptop 15s-fq2xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 26%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 19.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics15.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive8.42% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (99%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Laptop 15s-fq2xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 87FE
Memory6.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211015
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 26 '22 at 12:40
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 99%

 PC Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1165G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
19.2% Very poor
Memory 4.82
1-Core 41.3
2-Core 37.6
15% 27.9 Pts
4-Core 178
8-Core 400
33% 289 Pts
64-Core 419
26% 419 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 19.2%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
HP(103C 87FE) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8935
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
15.3% Very poor
Lighting 18.3
Reflection 24.7
Parallax 24.4
15% 22.5 fps
MRender 21.2
Gravity 23.5
Splatting 15.3
16% 20 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 15.3%
Great: 20%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme KINGSTON OM8SBP3512K-AH 512GB
391GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS2 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 57 52 51 94 60 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
8.42% Terrible
Read 78.9
Write 37.3
Mixed 49.5
SusWrite 63.8
13% 57.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3.9
4K Mixed 1
4% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 8.42%
Great: 191%
WD Elements SE 2623 1TB
924GB free, PID 2623
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 52 45 48 59 53 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
18.1% Very poor
Read 28.5
Write 55.4
Mixed 39.4
SusWrite 51.3
64% 43.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.4
45% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 18.1%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6DJR8N-XN HMA851S6DJR6N-XN 12GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
36.7% Below average
MC Read 12.8
MC Write 17.2
MC Mixed 13.1
41% 14.4 GB/s
SC Read 4
SC Write 13.1
SC Mixed 5.9
22% 7.67 GB/s
Latency 455
9% 455 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 36.7%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Laptop 15s-fq2xxx Builds (Compare 2,228 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: HP Laptop 15s-fq2xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback