Today's hottest deals

HP Laptop 15s-fq4xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics17.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive191% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP Laptop 15s-fq4xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 89BC
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220321
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateJun 11 '22 at 06:49
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1195G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
41.1% Average
Memory 79.3
1-Core 159
2-Core 129
77% 122 Pts
4-Core 19.8
8-Core 31.6
3% 25.7 Pts
64-Core 185
11% 185 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
HP(103C 89BC) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1029
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
17.6% Very poor
Lighting 20.3
Reflection 28.3
Parallax 27.4
16% 25.3 fps
MRender 25
Gravity 29.1
Splatting 20
20% 24.7 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 17.6%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme KINGSTON OM8SBP3512K-AH 512GB
412GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS2 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 478 850 757 1125 1137 989 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
191% Outstanding
Read 1,584
Write 1,252
Mixed 949
SusWrite 889
261% 1,169 MB/s
4K Read 43.5
4K Write 136
4K Mixed 26.3
171% 68.5 MB/s
DQ Read 666
DQ Write 388
DQ Mixed 461
361% 505 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 191%
Great: 191%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43EB1-CWE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
46.7% Average
MC Read 35.1
MC Write 8.9
MC Mixed 10.3
52% 18.1 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 2.4
SC Mixed 2.1
14% 4.87 GB/s
Latency 81.8
49% 81.8 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Laptop 15s-fq4xxx Builds (Compare 562 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard

System: HP Laptop 15s-fq4xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback