Today's hottest deals

Asus WS X299 PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics27.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive263% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus WS X299 PRO  (all builds)
Memory119.8 GB free of 128 GB @ 3 GHz
Display2560 x 2880 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181130
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 23 '22 at 18:50
Run Duration926 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-7980XE-$973
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 18 cores, 36 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
89.9% Excellent
Memory 81.3
1-Core 132
2-Core 264
87% 159 Pts
4-Core 527
8-Core 1051
93% 789 Pts
64-Core 3,242
201% 3,242 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 89.9%
Great: 95%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$91
Device(7377 0000) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
27.7% Poor
Lighting 35.6
Reflection 34.1
Parallax 32.6
29% 34.1 fps
MRender 37.5
Gravity 34.4
Splatting 23.1
25% 31.7 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 27.7%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$265
204GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 1034 881 829 788 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
263% Outstanding
Read 2,493
Write 1,021
Mixed 711
SusWrite 589
264% 1,203 MB/s
4K Read 44.9
4K Write 179
4K Mixed 81.2
267% 102 MB/s
DQ Read 1,042
DQ Write 947
DQ Mixed 940
720% 976 MB/s
Poor: 215%
This bench: 263%
Great: 425%
Intel SSDPE2KX040T7 4TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: QDV10130
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0 9 1502 1530 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
133% Outstanding
Read 110
Write 69.9
Mixed 50.5
SusWrite 507
42% 184 MB/s
4K Read 11.7
4K Write 194
4K Mixed 39.3
170% 81.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,088
DQ Write 985
DQ Mixed 1,046
782% 1,040 MB/s
Poor: 133%
This bench: 133%
Great: 262%
Samsung 860 Pro 4TB-$846
1.5TB free
Firmware: RVM02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 271 279 490 491 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 513
Write 487
Mixed 434
SusWrite 255
95% 422 MB/s
4K Read 43.1
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 59.4
200% 71.3 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 337
DQ Mixed 343
262% 355 MB/s
Poor: 84%
This bench: 115%
Great: 131%
Seagate Enterprise Capacity 8TB
1TB free
Firmware: SN05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0 0.8 136 137 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
52.3% Above average
Read 134
Write 128
Mixed 89
SusWrite 45.7
74% 99.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 7.4
4K Mixed 1.2
329% 3.33 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 128%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C16 8x16GB
8 of 8 slots used
128GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
131% Outstanding
MC Read 43.5
MC Write 70.4
MC Mixed 45.1
151% 53 GB/s
SC Read 9.2
SC Write 25.6
SC Mixed 12.6
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 78.1
51% 78.1 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 131%
Great: 163%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical WS X299 PRO Builds (Compare 219 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 132%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 166%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus WS X299 PRO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $1,640
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback